Brazil 2012

This was an amazing year in that I was able to make two trips to Brazil. The first, in February, was to participate in a set of dialogues with Peter Forgacs whose films were shown in a major retrospective that travelled, as we did, from  Rio to Sao Paolo to Brasilia. The came just a few months after the publication of  Cinema’s Alchemist, a terrific collection of essays edited by myself and Michael Renov.  [See Books for more info.]

The second was in November when I had an opportunity to give a series of lecturs at universities in Salvador, Cachoeria, and Campinas.  The talks were on aspects of documentary and were to audiences of over 100, a clear sign of the vitality and depth of film fever in Brazil.  Even if commercial opportunities are not enormous they do exist and unversity students have a vivid passion for the study and making of films. Documentary film is exceptionally diverse and imaginative in its range and complexity.  It was a great learning experience.  I am preparing at least one of the lectures, on “The Ironic Text” for publication as a fresh look at the mockumentary as a key part of a larger category better described by irony than mockery or parody.

Up!

Today, the blog went live.

Much more content will follow but this is a beginning.  Comments on films, info on books and articles I’ve done, consulting projects, thoughts on the arts and politics of our time, and a touch of fiction too.

Madamoiselle

This is as strange as a mainstream film gets. Directed by British director and a leader of the “kitchen sinkers” of the 1950s, Tony Richardson, set in France, with Jeanne Moreau as a sadistic, sociopathic school teacher in a little rural town, spoken in English, with a smattering of French accents, but not from Ms. Moreau, and with several key characters speaking in Italian with no sub-titles, the film seems like a dry run for Haneke’s The White Ribbon, though it is far from dry.  There is, as there always is, a simmering eroticism in Jeanne Moreau’s performance, even when she is her most repressive schoolteacher self and her doppleganger self, who does heinous deeds leading to death, destruction and vigilante action against an innocent man, is as close to cracking as Tony Perkins at his most neurotic but with that added frisson of sexual desire that cannot be fully and finally contained.

It isn’t a great film but it’s a fascinating example of what can happen on the margins of the mainstream. Few reviewed it, Roger Ebert, who is quite astute, panned it, but I find it a glorious example of bad art revelling in its badness. That Jean Genet and Marguerite Duras somehow collaborated or revised each other’s scripts may have had something to do with it.  It’s hard to imagine many films in the 60s having sex scenes as raw, kinky, and hot as the one Richardson builds up in this film.  It’s worth the price of admission alone and  leaves one to ponder if it exists to allow for lingering shots of the handsome Italian woodsman who is Moreau’s seducer and victim simultaneously; he gets lots of screen time and clearly had Genet if not Richardson’s full attention.